| 25-287 |
Gerardo Gonzalez-Valencia v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2025-09-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review interests-of-justice judicial-discretion remand-standards section-2106 statutory-interpretation |
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2106, Congress granted this Court and the courts of appeals broad authority to act in the interests of justice. The issue here is wh… |
| 23-5877 |
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi v. City of Flagstaff, Arizona |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-10-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment interests-of-justice judicial-subpoena judicial-system national-origin race |
Is the Currency of obtaining a Justice determined by one's race, ethnicity, and nothing to do on one's merits? Are First Amendment and Fourteenth Amen… |
| 21-1257 |
Brian K. Evans, as Administrator of the Estate of Helen Marie Bousquet v. Ronald A. Marvin, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2022-03-16 |
Denied |
|
appearance-of-impropriety conflict-of-interest due-process interests-of-justice judicial-bias judicial-ethics judicial-misconduct medical-malpractice recusal |
1. Was it appropriate for a judge to conceal that he
was married to a doctor admitted to practice in the
very hospital Plaintiff was suing in a medica… |
| 20-7652 |
Lawrence L. Colton v. J. A. Terris, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-04-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion appellate-review civil-procedure district-court due-process habeas-corpus interests-of-justice procedural-validity sixth-circuit writ-of-certiorari |
Whether the Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is procedurally invalid because the Panel failed to consider, and overlo… |
| 20-6030 |
Byron A. Wyatt v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-10-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure evidentiary-sufficiency interest-of-justice interests-of-justice material-evidence newly-discovered-evidence rule-33 standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence trial-standard |
Whether F.R.Crim.P. Rule 33's standard for granting a new trial based on newly discovered evidence "if the interest of justice so requires" cannot be … |
| 19-6323 |
Michael Taffaro v. New Jersey |
New Jersey |
2019-10-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process evidence evidence-exclusion ineffective-assistance interests-of-justice judicial-review perjury perjury-claim post-conviction-relief procedural-default procedural-rules standing testimony witness-testimony |
1. WHETHER A DECISION AFFIRMING EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE ,
IN THIS CASE A TRANSCRIPT, CAN BE CORRECT IF
UNINFORMED AS TO THE TRANSCRIPT'S ACTUAL CONTEN… |
| 19-6270 |
Darren Paul Odell v. Minnesota |
Minnesota |
2019-10-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process expert-witness ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel interests-of-justice mental-illness newly-discovered-evidence post-conviction-relief professional-ethics prosecutorial-misconduct standing time-bar-exception |
(1)Article from Summer 2016 issue in Cure-Sort News Vol. 25, Issue 3 under heading, Letters From Across the Nation, which are damaging. Info found at … |
| 19-5477 |
Brian Keith Waugh v. MedStar Georgetown University Hospital |
District of Columbia |
2019-08-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
amended-complaint civil-procedure due-process en-banc-review interests-of-justice medical-malpractice mental-capacity notice notice-pleading rule-15c statute-of-limitations |
The Medical Malpractice Amendment Act of 2006 makes a distinction between D.C. Code § 16*2802 and D.C. Code § 16*2804. Under D.C. Code § 16*2804, the … |