No. 20-7652
Lawrence L. Colton v. J. A. Terris, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review civil-procedure district-court due-process habeas-corpus interests-of-justice procedural-validity sixth-circuit writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is procedurally invalid because the Panel failed to consider, and overlooked the issue of whether the District Court abused its discretion when it failed to consider and exercise its discretion in determining whether Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. § 2243 was appropriate, in the interests of justice?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion in determining the appropriateness of a habeas corpus petition
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-06
Waiver of right of respondent J. A. Terris, Warden to respond filed.
2020-04-20
Application (19A1020) denied by Justice Sotomayor.
2020-03-26
Application (19A1020) for a stay, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2020-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 3, 2021)
Attorneys
J. A. Terris, Warden
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Lawrence L. Colton
Lawrence L. Colton — Petitioner