| 25A155 |
Jasmine Younge v. Fulton Judicial Circuit District Attorney's Office, Georgia |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-08-06 |
Presumed Complete |
|
affirmative-defense civil-procedure federal-rules pleading-amendment scheduling-order summary-judgment |
Question not identified. |
| 20-1296 |
Walter Skipper v. A&M Dockside Repair, Incorporated, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-03-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
affirmative-defenses circuit-split civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure pleading-amendment scheduling-order summary-judgment supreme-court-precedent |
Does precedent in the United State Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit which allows defendants to raise affirmative defenses in a motion for summar… |
| 18-1450 |
Horacio Sequeira v. Gate Safe, Inc., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-05-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
ada-amendments-act-2008 americans-with-disabilities-act civil-procedure due-process eeoc employment employment-discrimination false-statement medical-restrictions procedural-rules scheduling-order summary-judgment |
Federal law prohibits FALSE STATEMENT IN COURT against Americans with Disabilities Act incumbent in potential companies that force to work under medic… |
| 18-1409 |
Saied Emami v. Jim Bridenstine, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-05-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abuse-of-discretion civil-rights civil-rights-act-of-1964 discovery discrimination due-process employment-discrimination expert-witness procedural-due-process retaliation sanctions scheduling-order title-vii |
Whether the Respondent's counsel that failed to comply with the District Court Scheduling Order necessarily violate procedural due process rights of t… |
| 18-6501 |
Carl A. Robertson v. Interactive College of Technology, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-10-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
cat's-paw-theory civil-procedure civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination evidentiary-rules mcdonnell-douglas-framework pretext pro-se pro-se-litigant scheduling-order standing summary-judgment title-vii |
Based on the Supreme Court of the United States precedents:
Should a 'pro se litigant's" [or any litigant's] First Proposed
"Heightened" Amended Com… |