| 25-1028 |
Porter Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2026-02-27 |
Pending |
Response RequestedResponse Waived |
americans-with-disabilities-act anti-discrimination circuit-split private-right-of-action rehabilitation-act retaliation-claims |
Whether Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 794, authorizes a private right of action for retaliation. |
| 25-815 |
Siddharth Kode v. Joseph Pargin, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2026-01-09 |
Denied |
|
contract-discrimination post-formation precedent-interpretation retaliation-claims statute-of-limitations time-barred |
|1.| Whether a court's ruling that §1981 postformation discrimination/retaliation claims are time-barred because of its application of 2Y-SoL rather t… |
| 23A267 |
Patricia L. Harrison v. South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-09-26 |
Denied |
|
americans-with-disabilities-act medicaid-act retaliation-claims section-1983 statute-of-limitations title-ii-ada |
Question not identified. |
| 21-1585 |
Richard Arnold, et al. v. Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2022-06-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-error constructive-discharge due-process free-speech judicial-review navy-chaplaincy promotion-procedures religious-speech res-judicata retaliation retaliation-claims |
1. Did the Court of Appeals commit constitutional error in holding that In re Navy Chaplaincy's denial of Petitioners' systemic challenges to the Navy… |
| 20-1763 |
Fenyang Stewart v. Wilbur L. Ross, Secretary of Commerce, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-06-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law burden-shifting but-for-analysis disability-discrimination disability-related-interference merit-systems-protection-board rehabilitation-act retaliation retaliation-claims statutory-interpretation statutory-text |
Should disability-related interference claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12203(b) be analyzed as retaliation claims susceptible to a burden-shift… |
| 19-7702 |
Douglas Cornell Jackson v. Leah Berean, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-02-19 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
abuse-of-discretion access-to-courts civil-rights civil-rights-retaliation court-access due-process equal-protection indigent-rights judicial-discretion pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation retaliation retaliation-claims standing |
1. WHETHER THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AND U.S. DISTRICT COURT DECISIONS CONFLICT WITH THE FORMULATION DESCRIBING RETALIATION CLAIMS WITHIN THE U.S. CIR… |
| 19-500 |
Ameer Siddiqui v. NetJets Aviation, Inc. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-10-18 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
but-for but-for-test causation-standard civil-rights comparator-analysis comparators employment-discrimination pretext pretext-evaluation reasonable-inference retaliation retaliation-claims section-1981 summary-judgment title-vii |
1. Are plaintiffs who bring retaliation claims under either Title VII or Section 1981 subjected to the strenuous "but for" test, or is a reasonable in… |
| 18-1356 |
Dayo Adetu, et al. v. Sidwell Friends School |
District of Columbia |
2019-04-29 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
academic-deference civil-rights damages discrimination human-rights-act material-adverse-action material-adversity non-pecuniary-damages retaliation retaliation-claims settlement-agreement summary-judgment |
42 U.S.C. § 1981(b) and the D.C. Human Rights Act, § 2 -1402.61 protect individuals who engage in protected activity from retaliation. This case conce… |