1. WHETHER THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AND U.S. DISTRICT COURT DECISIONS CONFLICT WITH THE FORMULATION DESCRIBING RETALIATION CLAIMS WITHIN THE U.S. CIRCUIT COURTS.

2. WHETHER THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AND U.S. DISTRICT COURT DECISIONS CONFLICT WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S DECISIONS REGARDING ILLITERATE INDIGENT SEGREGATED PRO SE INMATES ACCESS OF THE COURTS.

3. WHETHER DEFENDANT LEAH BEREAN, INTERFERED WITH PETITIONER'S ACCESS OF THE COURT DURING THE APPEAL STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS BY HER MISCONDUCT.

4. WHETHER THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT CREATED AN EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS ISSUE ITSELF BY ITS RULING.

5. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT INTENTIONALLY ABUSED ITS DISCRETION DURING ITS SCREENING BY GOING OUTSIDE THE RECORD AT THE PLEADING STAGE OF THE PROCEEDING THEREBY GIVING THE APPEARANCE OF BIAS.

6. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT INTENTIONALLY ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DEEMING THE PRO SE LITIGANT'S INITIAL MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AS A 42 U.S.C. § 1983 COMPLAINT.

7. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT INTENTIONALLY ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY CONSTRUING PETITIONER'S PRO SE MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION AS A MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 59(e).

Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals and U.S. District Court decisions conflict with the formulation describing retaliation claims within the U.S. Circuit Courts