| 25-6461 |
Michael Anthony Christopher Cochren, II v. White Castle System, Inc., et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-12-31 |
Pending |
Response WaivedIFP |
court-clerk-duties default-judgment federal-rules-civil-procedure record-falsification service-of-summons waiver-of-service |
Introductory Statement: White Castle System, Inc.'s redundant counsel improperly waived service, outside of FRCP 4(d), and nullified a summons. This c… |
| 21-601 |
Michael B. Ellis, et al. v. Amy Berman Jackson, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2021-10-26 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
anti-injunction-act appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process irs judicial-review pro-se-litigation record-falsification standing |
Question 1:
Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and
practice of refusing to adjudicate
EVERY
issue
presented by the Class of disrespecte… |
| 21-545 |
Michael B. Ellis, et al. v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2021-10-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-review due-process judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigation record-falsification recusal standing |
Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresen… |
| 21-5785 |
Gregory Albert Darst v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-09-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-rights coram-nobis due-process irs-records judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigation record-falsification standing |
Question 1.
Does a pattern and practice exist whereby appellate courts refuse to adjudicate EVERY
ISSUE presented by the Class of unrepresented litig… |
| 20-7613 |
Carl Womack v. Merrimon Oxley |
North Carolina |
2021-03-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process gatekeeper-order judicial-conflict record-falsification standing supreme-court unconstitutional |
Is Merrimon Oxley tied to a major international cult?
Is the gatekeeper order a matter of significance to the united states
Did Judge Pope have a co… |
| 18-1402 |
Harold R. Stanley, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2019-05-07 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-procedure appellate-procedure,filing-fees,refunds Can Circuits impose a burden to prove circumstance Can litigants present their case to appellate cour court-administration court-discretion due-process due-process,mandamus,judicial-misconduct,irs,recor irs judicial-misconduct mandamus mandamus-relief pacer,appellate-procedure,records-on-appeal procedural-due-process record-falsification rule-59-motion supervisory-powers |
Question 1. In Re: DCCoA 19-5047
When a United States judge refuses for multiple months to adjudicate a Rule 59(e) Motion setting forth his acts of mi… |