Question 1.
Does a pattern and practice exist whereby appellate courts refuse to adjudicate EVERY
ISSUE presented by the Class of unrepresented litigants appealing issues arising from the
underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support
thereof by involved U.S. district judges?

Question 2.
Since involved district judges know unrepresented victims have no access to substantive,
meaningful appellate relief, does such setting itself constitute a separate violation of the
due process rights of victims?

Question 3.
Should my Coram Nobis Motion be restored to the criminal case in which it belongs, and
the Hon. Judge Scriven be recused?

Does a pattern and practice exist whereby appellate courts refuse to adjudicate every issue presented by the Class of unrepresented litigants appealing issues arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges?