Question 1:
Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and
practice of refusing to adjudicate
EVERY
issue
presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented
litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying
institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and
from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district
judges?

Question 2:
Did the Circuit Court of Appeals fail to carry its de
novo burden to prove, in support of Judge Kelly's
holding, that Congress' enactment of the AntiInjunction Act stripped courts of power to review the
institutionalized falsification of IRS records concerning
targeted Americans?

Do courts of appeal nationwide exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY issue presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by involved U.S. district judges?