| 24A615 |
Keeba Scott Harris v. Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2024-12-20 |
Presumed Complete |
|
criminal-prosecution habeas-corpus jurisdictional-challenge native-american sepric-reservation tribal-jurisdiction |
Question not identified. |
| 24A619 |
Tonia Scott v. Pennsylvania |
Third Circuit |
2024-12-20 |
Presumed Complete |
|
criminal-prosecution due-process fourteenth-amendment jurisdiction native-american tribal-sovereignty |
Question not identified. |
| 23-7744 |
In Re William F. Laffoon |
|
2024-06-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection jurisdiction mcgirt-ruling native-american native-american-rights reservation-law retroactivity tribal-jurisdiction |
on /Vku 7T*1 203.H 3imCU dfGirtuJas
Set Feet nfter'feCiev'/ruJtl/ne Served .
tke Volina u5aS .Made tavl ^RoryxlA k, (dkiTC.
of tke united States Dis… |
| 21-7379 |
Patrick Joseph Terry v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2022-03-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process ex-post-facto native-american native-american-rights post-conviction-proceedings procedural-bar standing state-court-review terry-v-oklahoma |
1. "Did the State of Oklahoma 's refusal to provide the relief directed by
this Court in Terry v Oklahoma, 141 S, Ct. 191 (2020), rise to the
level … |
| 21-6507 |
Lyle Quinton Brown v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2021-12-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
circuit-court civil-rights due-process judicial-decision jurisdiction native-american official-authority precedent retroactivity statutory-interpretation |
1. Whether or not Matloff v. Wallace, 2021 OK CR 21 no retroactivity decision conflicts with the holding in Sharp v. Murphy, U.S. 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020… |
| 21-5073 |
Brian Adrian Sloan v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-07-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-jurisdiction equal-protection fifth-amendment indian-country major-crimes-act native-american native-american-rights racial-classification |
Whether United States v. Antelope, 430 U.S. 641 (1977), should be overruled because the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1153—which transforms certain ac… |
| 20-7138 |
Patrick Begay v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-02-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3553 aggravated-assault criminal-procedure federal-sentencing guidelines judicial-discretion native-american native-american-defendants sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation united-states-sentencing-commission |
In carrying out the mandate of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to impose a sentence that is "sufficient but not greater than necessary on a defendant," may a dist… |
| 20-6203 |
Rachel O. v. Alaska Department of Health and Social Services |
Alaska |
2020-11-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law alaska-supreme-court civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection guardianship native-american standing |
(jjVvjur-e iS i". O. ?
are "HvjLne- ~^l£,
uj ord> 11 KXr\C<^S pOY^Si v^d' ?
Is it" ^f-Pexiiv/c \\S+ £a>'AY 0_r ^a^cliACi i-0 bs
C-los^d minded Ao noi… |
| 19-6433 |
Edward Anthony Torres v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-jurisdiction district-court due-process federal-courts indian-status jurisdiction jurisdictional-issue magistrate-court native-american native-american-law ninth-circuit pretrial-decision standing statutory-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Whether a district court may, pretrial, decide an Indian status jurisdictional question in light of conflicting Ninth Circuit law that results in a fe… |
| 18-5273 |
Davian Wilson v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-07-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
authentication criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-sufficiency-of-evidence criminal-trial evidence-authentication federal-criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction guilty-verdict jury-verdict native-american reasonable-jury sentencing-disparities sentencing-disparity standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence |
1) Whether the district court erred by finding that the prosecution produced sufficient evidence at trial for a reasonable jury to return a guilty ver… |