1) Whether the district court erred by finding that the prosecution produced sufficient evidence at trial for a reasonable jury to return a guilty verdict against Mr. Wilson.

2) Whether the district court erred by allowing admission of Mr. Wilson's clothing into evidence at trial, when the evidence was not properly authenticated.

3) Whether the district court ordered a substantively unreasonable sentence because Mr. Wilson's sentence was unjustly disparate in comparison to the co-participants in the alleged crime and in comparison to other defendants convicted of murder in federal court.

Whether the district court erred in finding sufficient evidence for a guilty verdict against Mr. Wilson