No. 21-6507
Lyle Quinton Brown v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: circuit-court civil-rights due-process judicial-decision jurisdiction native-american official-authority precedent retroactivity statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether or not Matloff v. Wallace, 2021 OK CR 21 no retroactivity decision conflicts with the holding in Sharp v. Murphy, U.S. 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020)?
2. Whether or not Matloff v. Wallace, 2021 OK CR 21 no retroactivity decision conflicts with United States v. Dashney, 52 F.3d 298, 299 (10th Cir 1995)?
3. Whether or not Matloff v. Wallace, 2021 OK CR 21 no retroactivity decision conflicts with United States v. Johnson, 102 S.Ct. 2579 (1982)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Matloff v. Wallace, 2021 OK CR 21 non-retroactivity decision conflicts with the holdings in Sharp v. Murphy, 140 S. Ct. 2412 (2020) and McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020)?
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Lyle Quinton Brown
Lyle Quinton Brown — Petitioner