keller-v-state-bar
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21-974 | Sylvia Borunda Firth, et al. v. Tony K. McDonald, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2022-01-06 | Denied | administrative-agency civil-rights first-amendment free-speech free-speech-clause government-speech judicial-department keller-v-state-bar overrule-precedent state-bar | 1. Whether the State Bar of Texas, which is "a public corporation and an administrative agency of the judicial department of [the Texas] government," … | |
| 21-357 | Lucille S. Taylor v. James W. Heath, President-Elect, State Bar of Michigan Board of Commissioners, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2021-09-07 | Denied | Relisted (2) | compelled-speech exacting-scrutiny first-amendment integrated-bar keller-v-state-bar labor-unions policy-positions public-sector public-sector-employees | In Janus v. AFSCME, 138 S.Ct. 2448 (2018), this Court held that laws that impinge on public-sector employees' First Amendment rights are subject to "e… |
| 20-1678 | Daniel Z. Crowe, et al. v. Oregon State Bar, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2021-06-02 | Denied | Amici (10)Response Waived | attorney-regulation compelled-speech constitutional-scrutiny first-amendment free-speech keller-v-state-bar mandatory-dues political-speech public-sector-unions state-bar | This Court has held that "exacting" First Amendment scrutiny applies to laws that force public employees to subsidize the speech and political activit… |
| 20-1520 | Diane Gruber, et al. v. Oregon State Bar, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2021-04-30 | Denied | Response Waived | bar-association compelled-speech constitutional-law first-amendment freedom-of-speech integrated-bar janus-v-afscme keller-v-state-bar legal-precedent mandatory-dues | This case involves compelled speech of attorneys and whether that compelled speech unconstitutionally infringes upon the attorneys' Freedom of Speech:… |