Sylvia Borunda Firth, et al. v. Tony K. McDonald, et al.
1. Whether the State Bar of Texas, which is "a public corporation and an administrative agency of the judicial department of [the Texas] government," Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 81.011(a), qualifies as a government agency for purposes of the government speech doctrine, such that the State Bar of Texas's speech is "not subject to scrutiny under the [First Amendment's] Free Speech Clause," Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460, 464 (2009).
2. To the extent that this Court's case law—including Keller v. State Bar of California, 496 U.S. 1 (1990)—precludes applying the government speech doctrine to the State Bar of Texas's speech, whether that precedent should be overruled.
Whether the State Bar of Texas qualifies as a government agency for purposes of the government speech doctrine