| 25-6911 |
Gregory W. Pheasant v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2026-02-25 |
Pending |
IFP |
administrative-law criminal-law executive-power intelligible-principle nondelegation-doctrine separation-of-powers |
Whether § 1733(a) violates the nondelegation doctrine by giving the Executive near-unfettered power to define what conduct is subject to criminal puni… |
| 25A865 |
Thomas Keller v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2026-02-02 |
Application |
|
attorney-general-regulation congressional-delegation controlled-substances criminal-liability intelligible-principle nondelegation-doctrine |
Question not identified. |
| 20-1595 |
Naum Morgovsky and Irina Morgovsky v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-05-17 |
Denied |
|
appellate-waiver arms-export-control-act class-v-united-states constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure criminal-statute executive-authority intelligible-principle rule-12(b)(3) separation-of-powers |
1. Whether the Executive had the authority to issue the regulations under which the Morgovskys were convicted; if so, whether those regulations and th… |
| 18-161 |
Detroit International Bridge Company, Inc., et al. v. Department of State, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2018-08-07 |
Dismissed |
|
civil-rights due-process international-agreements separation-of-powers standing ' non-delegation' compact-clause congress-power constitutional-delegation constitutional-limits delegation-of-power executive-agency foreign-power intelligible-principle state-compact state-foreign-power |
1. Whether Congress may delegate to an Executive
Agency the duty the Constitution expressly assigns to
Congress to decide whether to "Consent" to an… |