No. 25-6911
Gregory W. Pheasant v. United States
IFP
Tags: administrative-law criminal-law executive-power intelligible-principle nondelegation-doctrine separation-of-powers
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether § 1733(a) violates the nondelegation doctrine by giving the Executive near-unfettered power to define what conduct is subject to criminal punishment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether § 1733(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act violates the nondelegation doctrine by giving the Executive near-unfettered power to define what conduct is subject to criminal punishment
Docket Entries
2026-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2026)
2025-12-19
Application (25A727) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 28, 2026.
2025-12-17
Application (25A727) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 29, 2026 to February 28, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Gregory Pheasant
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent