financial-conflict
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-6904 | Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola v. Garmin International, Inc. | Tenth Circuit | 2025-04-01 | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | due-process financial-conflict judicial-disqualification judicial-ethics pro-se-plaintiff rule-60-motion | Whether the District Court in Kansas denied pro se Plaintiff due process when it declined to file Plaintiff's Rule 60(b)(6) motion requesting the Cour… |
| 24A364 | Debra Brown v. et Bank of America Corporation, et al. | First Circuit | 2024-10-17 | Denied | court-integrity due-process financial-conflict judicial-recusal mandamus section-455 | Question not identified. | |
| 22-458 | TIG Insurance Company v. ExxonMobil Oil Corporation | Second Circuit | 2022-11-15 | Dismissed | 28-usc-455 appellate-review financial-conflict judicial-conflicts-of-interest judicial-disqualification judicial-ethics judicial-impartiality judicial-recusal legal-procedure liljeberg-test public-confidence-in-judiciary | In Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corporation, 486 U.S. 847 (1988), this Court set forth a three-factor test to determine whether it is appr… | |
| 21-6537 | Stephen Condon Peters v. United States | Fourth Circuit | 2021-12-07 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | asset-forfeiture asset-restraint counsel-of-choice criminal-procedure due-process financial-conflict luis-v-united-states right-to-counsel sixth-amendment | Does it violate this Court's holding in Luis U. United States and the Sixth Amendment, where the trial court deprives a defendant of the use of untain… |
| 18-6796 | Paul L. Muckle v. Wells Fargo Bank, et al. | First Circuit | 2018-11-27 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights code-of-conduct due-process eleventh-amendment financial-conflict financial-interest judicial-conduct judicial-recusal ninth-amendment recusal standing | Did the second panel, assigned to hear the appeal, err in denying Muckle's motion to remand the case or recuse itself because it concerns the appearan… |