Does it violate this Court's holding in Luis U. United States and the Sixth Amendment, where the trial court deprives a defendant of the use of untainted assets without following proper procedure, and then attempts to address the improper restraint by forcing retained counsel to try the case on an appointed basis, notwithstanding counsel's and client's objection that the stated financial conflict impacted performance.

Does it violate the Sixth Amendment where the trial court deprives a defendant of the use of untainted assets without following proper procedure, and then attempts to address the improper restraint by forcing retained counsel to try the case on an appointed basis, notwithstanding counsel's and client's objection that the stated financial conflict impacted performance?