| 24A283 |
Joseph William Hart v. Chance Andes, Acting Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-09-20 |
Presumed Complete |
|
brady-evidence capital-case habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance penalty-phase prosecutorial-misconduct |
Question not identified. |
| 21-8207 |
Jamal A. Azeez v. Cedrick Robertson, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-06-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence aedpa antiterrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act brady-evidence civil-rights due-process factual-innocence judicial-conspiracy standing statute-of-limitations |
1. Whether The Task Falls To The Federal Courts At Some Point In The Judicial
Process, Even When A Was Person Convicted Of A Heinous Crime, Deserves
A… |
| 21-623 |
Anthony Penton v. A. Malfi, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-10-28 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
brady-evidence brady-v-maryland criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment prior-convictions prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment suppressed-evidence |
1. Whether evidence covered by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and withheld by prosecutors is considered suppressed under the Fifth Amendment r… |
| 21-5439 |
Michael Geoffrey Peters v. Bobby Lumpkin. Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-08-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-evidence constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct jurisdiction jury-selection trial-procedure |
1. Whether or not I am guilty on Count No.l of the indictment?
2. Whether or not I am guilty of Count No.3 of the indictment?
3. Whether of not the … |
| 21-5183 |
Robert McMillian v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2021-07-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-evidence california criminal-procedure district-of-columbia due-process evidence-suppression judicial-conflict prosecutorial-misconduct supreme-court |
I. Whether the opinion of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals concerning the withholding of material Brady evidence is inconsistent with opinion… |
| 20-6751 |
Roger Darryl Waldrep v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-01-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
brady-evidence civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance self-representation sixth-amendment voluntariness-of-plea |
1F Does this Supreme Court Grant and Honor CIVIL RIGHTS to all Arizonans and US Citizens? If so, is Habeas Keelief and Remedy thus appropriate to any … |
| 20-6397 |
Douglas Cornejo v. Christian Pfeiffer, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-11-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-disclosure brady-evidence confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process preliminary-hearing prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-present-defense witness-testimony |
1. Should a COA Have Been Granted to Decide If the
Prosecutor's Failure to Disclose Brady Evidence
Deprived Cornejo of His Right to Confront and Cross… |
| 20-5360 |
Reinaldo Dennes v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-08-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-evidence brady-violation cause-and-prejudice circuit-split cullen-v-pinholster due-diligence due-process evidence-suppression habeas-corpus napue-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct witness-credibility |
Given the extreme facts of this case, should this Court finally turn to footnote 10 and Justice Sotomayor's dissenting opinion in Cullen v. Pinholster… |
| 19-7627 |
Ernesto Salgado Martinez v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure brady-claim brady-evidence brady-violation capital-case gonzalez-v-crosby ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-bias kyles-v-whitley ninth-circuit |
(1) Whether the Ninth Circuit misapplied this Court's law of implied judicial bias where, rather than considering the professional and social relation… |
| 19-7289 |
Willis Shane Gordon v. Sam Cline, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-01-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
apprendi-v-new-jersey apprendi-violation brady-evidence Brady-Violation burden-of-proof criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing double-jeopardy doyle-violation due-process exculpatory-evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-trial kansas-sentencing-guidelines post-arrest-silence prior-convictions procedural-bar prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing-guidelines |
Whether the Kansas courts violated petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, his Fifth Amendment right against self-incri… |
| 18-7796 |
Domineque Ray v. Alabama |
Alabama |
2019-02-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-disclosure brady-evidence brady-v-maryland due-process fair-trial incarceration incarceration-records institutional-files mental-health-records postconviction-relief star-witness statute-of-limitations |
A. Does Brady v. Maryland require the State to obtain and produce to the defense all available prison or other incarceration or institutional files co… |
| 18-7527 |
David Phillip Wilson v. Alabama |
Alabama |
2019-01-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-evidence brady-v-maryland brady-violation co-defendant-statement criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence-suppression ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel kaupp-v-texas probable-cause prosecutorial-misconduct wong-sun-v-united-states |
1. Whether the prosecution's failure to provide Brady evidence is excused by trial counsel's lack of diligence in pursuing that evidence, and whether … |
| 18-5783 |
Robert A. Cotton v. County of San Bernardino, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-08-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-evidence brady-v-maryland brady-violation civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process issue-preclusion judicial-immunity jury-trial manuel-v-city-of-joliet ninth-circuit preliminary-hearing qualified-immunity self-defense |
Was the Ninth Circuit in conflict with now, the Second, Third, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits, and the California Court of Appeal, First an… |