No. 20-6751

Roger Darryl Waldrep v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: brady-evidence civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance self-representation sixth-amendment voluntariness-of-plea
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-05-13 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1F Does this Supreme Court Grant and Honor CIVIL RIGHTS to all Arizonans and US Citizens? If so, is Habeas Keelief and Remedy thus appropriate to any FUNDAMENTAL Constitutional Rights Victims and MANNER of "Injustice" proven by his Position "By Virtue" as a US Citizen Imprisoned For 7 years Flat, just because the lower Courts have him his BRADY EVIDENCE "of the hon ay DMeE<10M, alleged to

a. Is Legal Police Recording en 12-03-2013 Unlawfully Impeded his deep—Imprisoned him? Denied his "Civil Rights" while he is guaranteed by the 5th and 6th Amendment Rights on a is right to No Unlawful Search, Right to Be A Witness against Self, Right to Minus Warrants and Right to have Counsel Present?

din "FARETTA V CAL" as Held Right to Self-Represented—a Right to Contest Ones own Defense?

The trial Judge Denied Un Waldeep's Unequivocal request Te Kepreseanthmself on 23-03-2016 pi thea Forced him to Coa lenmnediarens [a Teldt on OF-0b-Jolb, with Forced-Upon Public Defender who was totally Hostile and Ineffective, Would this Consthole a 6" Amead. Violation under Ruling WSict "Eanerta VCAR

= NHEARIMC, before outright Denial of their Right Ho Self-Representation, as beld in "FAgerta'CAL LAw, it he has been? Denied 21 "Motions W For Production of Established Record, Denied "38 "Motions For An EvibeamAay HEARING" and then, Denied "Motion To Shp BRADY Viel ATOMS by US Osh?

7 ay vePeocess been Violeted if Distt Denied oti na— and Without Reviewing Claims on ORIGINAL Petifen @

Wi and, 373 U5,33,87 Sct Cl: 963) and Milk eV Kyan, Anz me WE2dC Fein 2013)"An Unreasonable Determinahion ide Wallon) fan Missive KEY ASPECTS lok (Mr laldreps) Kecord by Dist.Ct Denying his £2 82054 Heheas Pedibion and COA, With 2UT Peckivesl

4) Can the Voluntwiness of Gutty PLEA be challenged OM BRADY CROWDS, as held in White PV US ase Badsel SMe (988) S54 DP NG hold A_Certikicate Of Appealability Ge Granted if agpellent has Been Denied his BRAY LE ADEM CE 2) Ten Criminal Proceedings, transects epocts listed in _Agpendix Ce, and ther "DEMED HL. court Liled Motions To Produce. Records; whch All Prove his Cowsti naar VieLArions¢

@__Does this Sct believe*A Reasonable. Sunt Coure Degare" whether FAILURE ty PRESENT pa appellaatand Reviewing Courts fis Denied NERA EWibECE, meet the. low threhbhild to ee in

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does this Supreme Court grant and honor civil rights to all Arizonans and U.S. citizens?

Docket Entries

2021-05-17
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-03-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-03-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent David Shinn, et al. to respond filed.
2020-12-31
Supplemental brief of petitioner Roger Darryl Waldrep filed.
2020-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2021)

Attorneys

David Shinn, et al.
Eliza YbarraOffice of the Arizona Attorney General, Respondent
Roger Darryl Waldrep
Roger Darryl Waldrep — Petitioner