Whether the Kansas courts violated petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, and his constitutional protection against double jeopardy by: (1) applying Kansas Sentencing Guidelines in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey; (2) permitting prosecution questions concerning petitioner's post-arrest silence in violation of Doyle v. Ohio; (3) withholding exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland; (4) providing ineffective assistance of counsel; and (5) allowing the State to define its way around Double Jeopardy protections under Blockburger v. United States.

Issues being raised