| 24-5099 |
Brandan C. Bellamy v. Chanse Houghton, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-07-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process hipaa hipaa-privacy malicious-prosecution privacy section-1983 standing summary-dismissal |
1. Whether Petitioner should be given another chance to make another amended complaint.
2. Whether Respondents shall be held liable for violating Pet… |
| 22-1037 |
Howard Center v. AFSCME Local 1674, et al. |
Vermont |
2023-04-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
arbitration-review civil-rights disciplinary-sanctions due-process federal-regulations health-privacy healthcare-regulation hipaa hipaa-privacy-rule patient-privacy workforce-compliance workforce-sanctions |
I. Pursuant to federal regulations collectively known as "the HIPAA Privacy Rule," must a covered entity like the Howard Center ensure compliance ther… |
| 22-5573 |
Anne P. Mulligan v. Alaska, et al. |
Alaska |
2022-09-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights corruption criminal-investigation due-process hipaa hipaa-violation hospital-records medical-privacy privacy sovereign-immunity |
(1) Why did the Respondent conduct their own investigation regarding the Petitioner?
(2) How did the Respondent conclude that the Petitioner committe… |
| 21-1289 |
Foster Taft v. Ventura County Medical Center, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-03-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 civil-rights due-process federal-regulation hipaa hipaa-privacy privacy privacy-act private-cause-of-action private-right-of-action state-actor |
1. Does 42 U.S.C. §1983 confer a private cause of action for privacy violations of HIPAA, in particular 164.502(a)?
Within this issue, the court woul… |
| 21-6792 |
Pauline Leslie v. Alexander Bodkin, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2022-01-10 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection hipaa independent-medical-examiner medical-malpractice |
Whether the State of Massachusetts has authority to abrogate a citizen's Constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment Due Process by depriving the c… |
| 21-6756 |
Tracy Clare Micks-Harm v. William Paul Nichols, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-01-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
absolute-immunity administrative-function civil-rights constitutional-rights HIPAA hipaa-immunity judicial-immunity proprietary-functions qualified-immunity retaliation search-and-seizure third-party-doctrine |
I. Does iralice, retaliation, deliberate indifference to the constitutional rights, acts committed within the scope of administrative function, acts c… |
| 20-6834 |
Cynthia Holmes v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-01-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process health-privacy healthcare-compliance HIPAA hipaa-privacy medical-privacy patient-rights physician-liability state-law state-law-preemption |
As applied by respondents in this case and in its ongoing pattern and practice, HIPAA's Privacy Rule cannot pass constitutional muster; respondents' w… |
| 20-5963 |
Daniel Edward Murray v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-10-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
aedpa aedpa-time-calculation hipaa hipaa-restrictions ineffective-assistance ineffective-counsel medical-records medical-records-disclosure plea-agreement plea-agreements pro-se pro-se-litigation |
1) If there is a set of plea agreements taken at the same time and the court
of appeals reverses a part of the appealed agreeemnt does this,
A) Start … |
| 19-1384 |
James E. Pietrangelo, II v. Corrinne Hudson |
Ohio |
2020-06-17 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts federal-law hipaa hipaa-compliance involuntary-consent litigation-procedure medical-authorization medical-authorizations personal-injury-claim supremacy-clause |
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-2; 45 C.F.R. pts. 160 & 164, requires any medical authoriza… |
| 19-5748 |
Seth Mitchell v. Macy's, Inc., et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-08-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights denial-of-motion disability-accommodation due-process employment-discrimination erisa federal-rules-of-civil-procedure first-amendment hipaa magistrate-judge motion-to-amend timeliness title-vii |
1. When, if ever, can a magistrate judge assigned to handle nondispositive matters in a Federal lawsuit intentionally violate Federal Rule of Civil Pr… |