| 24-81 |
The ServiceMaster Company, LLC, et al. v. Tyron Cooley |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-07-25 |
Denied |
|
arbitration-severance california-supreme-court federal-arbitration-act individual-claims non-individual-claims paga paga-claims severance standing |
In Viking River Cruises v. Moriana, 596 U.S. 638 (2022), this Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") requires the enforcement of agreemen… |
| 23-645 |
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. v. Johnathon Gregg |
California |
2023-12-14 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (2) |
arbitration california-supreme-court civil-procedure federal-arbitration-act individual-claims non-individual-claims paga paga-claims preemption severance standing |
In Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 142 S. Ct. 1906 (2022), this Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts the California-law rule th… |
| 22-7808 |
Elroy Pedro Gomez v. William Joe Sullivan, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
California-Supreme-Court criminal-procedure Due-process Equal-protection Habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance plea-bargain Sentencing-enhancements Sixth-Amendment |
1. In the fi rst pl ace, was Peti tioner deni ed hi s Sixth Amendment
right to the effecti ve assi stance of counsel when hi s court-appoi nted
trial … |
| 21-7181 |
Mary Ellen Samuels v. Janel Espinoza, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-02-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
california-supreme-court conflict-of-interest due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-malpractice performance prejudice prejudice-presumption supreme-court-precedent |
1. Did the California Supreme Court unreasonably fail to apply clearly established Supreme Court precedent that requires prejudice to be presumed wher… |
| 21-220 |
DoorDash, Inc. v. Brandon Campbell |
California |
2021-08-16 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
california-supreme-court epic-systems federal-arbitration-act individual-arbitration ninth-circuit private-attorneys-general-act |
Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under Californ… |
| 20-1795 |
Gregory Melvin Haynes v. State Bar of California |
California |
2021-06-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
attorney-discipline california-supreme-court clear-and-convincing-standard due-process reciprocal-discipline selling-v-radford summary-judgment |
Does the California Reciprocal attorney discipline statute —Business and
profession code 6049.1 - violate the standard set forth in Selling v
Radfor… |
| 20-6659 |
Eddie Ashley v. California, et al. |
California |
2020-12-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
california-law california-supreme-court constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-discretion sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements |
Does Petitioner had a Federal Due Process Right to the Prohibition of the Imposition of Two Different Sentencing Enhancements, per the California Supr… |
| 19-5840 |
Andre Kenneth Stuckey v. California |
California |
2019-09-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
california-supreme-court civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-counsel right-to-fair-trial sentencing supreme-court-review |
WHETHER MR. STUCKEY IS ENTITLED TO HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF WHEN ATTACKING HIS CONVICTION AND SENTENCING ON GROUNDS OF TITLE II A.D.A. AND A.D.A.A.A. VIOL… |
| 18-6003 |
David Kavandi v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al. |
California |
2018-09-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeal-dismissal california-supreme-court civil-procedure constitutional-rights dismissal-of-appeal due-process failure-to-file hospitalization illness-and-hospitalization procedural-fairness statutory-right-to-appeal |
Did the California Supreme Court violate the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution or the statutory right to appeal when it dismissed the petiti… |
| 18-5379 |
Marilyn Kaye Freeman v. Ralph Diaz, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-07-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-counsel california-supreme-court due-process fair-trial habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-disqualification precedent state-court-proceedings supreme-court-review trial-counsel |
Whether reinstatement of a previously disqualified judge deprived appellant of due process and a fair trial?
Whether trial or appellate counsel rende… |