No. 21-220
DoorDash, Inc. v. Brandon Campbell
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: california-supreme-court epic-systems federal-arbitration-act individual-arbitration ninth-circuit private-attorneys-general-act
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under California's Private Attorneys General Act, Cal. Lab. Code § 2698 et seq.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under California's Private Attorneys General Act, Cal. Lab. Code § 2698 et seq.
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent Brandon Campbell to respond filed.
2021-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Brandon Campbell
Alexander R. Wheeler — R. Rex Parris Law Firm, Respondent
DoorDash, Inc.
Joshua Seth Lipshutz — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner