No. 20-6659
Eddie Ashley v. California, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: california-law california-supreme-court constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-discretion sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does Petitioner had a Federal Due Process Right to the Prohibition of the Imposition of Two Different Sentencing Enhancements, per the California Supreme Court's own Authority?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Petitioner had a Federal Due Process Right to the Prohibition of the Imposition of Two Different Sentencing Enhancements, per the California Supreme Court's own Authority?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-06
Waiver of right of respondent California, et al. to respond filed.
2020-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2021)
Attorneys
California, et al.
David Andrew Wildman — CA Atty. Gene. Offfice, Respondent
Eddie Ashley
Eddie Ashley — Petitioner