28-usc-1927
3 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-404 | Matthew Edwin Gronda, et al. v. Title Check, LLC | Sixth Circuit | 2023-10-18 | Denied | Response Waived | 28-U.S.C-1927 28-usc-1927 attorney-sanctions first-legal-impression good-faith-argument legal-first-impression narrow-construction objective-recklessness subjective-bad-faith | I. May attorneys be sanctioned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 for filing a complaint which raises a good faith and legally supportable issue of first im… |
| 18-1380 | Thomas P. Gannon v. Riverwatch Condominium Owners' Assn., et al. | Third Circuit | 2019-05-02 | Denied | Response Waived | 28-usc-1927 appeal-procedure appellate-procedure attorney-fees attorney-sanctions civil-procedure dismissal-of-appeal due-process judicial-discretion notice-of-appeal procedural-technicality standing | 1. Should an attorney be punished with the severe penalty of the dismissal of his appeal where his notice of appeal reports that the appeal is from a … |
| 18-233 | Indiezone, Inc., et al. v. Todd Rooke, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2018-08-22 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2) | 28-usc-1927 act-of-state-doctrine congressional-intent due-process extraterritorial-application federal-sanctions inherent-powers rule-44.1 sanctions sovereign-immunity | Did congress intend the court's inherent powers and U.S. 28 U.S.C. § 1927 to apply extraterritorially allowing Rule 44.1 analysis to be applied to ove… |