No. 23-404
Matthew Edwin Gronda, et al. v. Title Check, LLC
Response Waived
Tags: 28-U.S.C-1927 28-usc-1927 attorney-sanctions first-legal-impression good-faith-argument legal-first-impression narrow-construction objective-recklessness subjective-bad-faith
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. May attorneys be sanctioned
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 for
filing a complaint which raises a
good faith and legally
supportable issue of first
impression?
II. Is subjective bad faith or
objective recklessness a
mandatory requirement before
imposing any sanctions on
attorneys pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1927?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May attorneys be sanctioned under 28-U.S.C-1927 for good-faith-arguments
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-30
Waiver of right of respondent Title Check LLC to respond filed.
2023-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 17, 2023)
2023-08-08
Application (23A107) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until October 14, 2023.
2023-08-03
Application (23A107) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 15, 2023 to October 14, 2023, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Matthew Gronda, et al.
Philip Lee Ellison — Outside Legal Counsel PLC, Petitioner
Title Check LLC
Theodore Wilson Seitz — Dykema Gossett PLLC, Respondent