No. 23-6309
Elvin Farris v. Vector Construction, Inc.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: amendment civil-rights discovery-rule EEOC eeoc-charge employment-discrimination legal-amendment statute-of-limitations termination-notice
Key Terms:
Environmental Immigration
Environmental Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Should the petitioner been allowed to amend the EEOC charge
2. Did the discovery of petitioner termination start a new limitations clock
3. Should the petitioner been allowed to use the discovery rule
4. Was the October notice of termination a separate act that happened in October
5. Did the evidence show a meaningful difference when it came to Vector Construction motive
6. The the termination fall outside the scope of the EEOC charge
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the petitioner been allowed to amend the EEOC charge
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-12-29
Waiver of right of respondent Vector Construction, Inc. to respond filed.
2023-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2024)
Attorneys
Elvin Farris
Elvin Farris — Petitioner
Vector Construction, Inc.
Matthew Tews — Stinson LLP, Respondent