This case poses multiple questions due to on
going and continuous instances of conduct rising to a
level of discrimination, harassment, intimidation, and
retaliation litigation proceedings back to 2005
throughout 2019. Petitioners have originally filed a
legal action in U.S. District Court in October 10, 2008
(see related case).

1. May a federal court ever grant a motion for relief
from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil procedure
60(b) in a case involving legal error?

2. Whether the district court erred in denying pro se
plaintiffs ' "motion for leave to amend " arising from
"newly discovered evidence " and "continuous and on
going " instances of discrimination, harassment,
intimidation, and retaliation?

3. Whether the Ninth Circuit 's decision conflicts with
its own and this Court 's precedents?

4. Whether petitioners have satisfied discrimination,
harassment, intimidation, and retaliation aspects
giving rise to a "hostile work environment claim "?

5. Is statistical data produced by petitioners-plaintiffs
clearly supporting "disparate treatment " or "selective
treatment " by opposing party admissible in federal
court?

6. Does this case provide a direct opportunity to settle
an issue of public interest and matter of public
concern?

Whether a federal court may grant relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) for legal error