No. 19-378
Alfred Lam, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al.
Response Waived
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the federal court abused its discretion granting costs to Respondents-Defendants despite their unclean hands and without any consideration of the public interest?
2. May a Federal Court ever grant a motion for relief from judgment under FRCP 59(b) in a case involving legal error?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal court abused its discretion granting costs to Respondents-Defendants despite their unclean hands and without any consideration of the public interest?
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-02
Waiver of right of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. to respond filed.
2019-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2019)
2019-06-28
Application (19A5) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 22, 2019.
2019-06-25
Application (19A5) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 18, 2019 to August 22, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Alfred Lam, et al.
Alfred Lam — Petitioner
City and County of San Francisco, et al.
Boris Reznikov — Office of San Francisco City Attorney, Respondent