No. 19-379
Alfred Lam, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process exceptional-importance federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fraud-on-the-court fraud-upon-court judicial-misconduct ninth-circuit perjury public-employee rule-60 standing
Key Terms:
Patent
Patent
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision imposes an erroneous and unjustifiable standard for "Fraud Upon The Court"?
2. Whether granting the writ generates an issue of exceptional importance to "public interest"?
3. Whether a "public employee", as witnesses in this case a "California Sworn Peace Officer" intentionally provided false information including supplemental filings to the court rising to a level constituting "fraud upon the court"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision imposes an erroneous and unjustifiable standard for 'Fraud Upon The Court'
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-02
Waiver of right of respondents City of County of San Francisco, et al. to respond filed.
2019-08-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2019)
2019-06-28
Application (19A6) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 1, 2019.
2019-06-25
Application (19A6) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 18, 2019 to September 1, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Alfred Lam, et al.
Alfred Lam — Petitioner
City of County of San Francisco, et al.
Boris Reznikov — Office of San Francisco City Attorney, Respondent