| 25-6767 |
Mario A. Manborde v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2026-02-10 |
Pending |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law due-process federal-law judicial-review manifest-injustice unreasonable-determination |
I. Is There a Constitutional Cure For Manifest Injustice?
II. Was There An Unreasonable Application of Clearly Established Federal Laws Upon An Unrea… |
| 23-7736 |
Clarence Mack v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-06-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254d2 brady-napue-claims brady-violation capital-punishment capital-trial habeas-corpus informant-testimony informant-witness napue-violation prosecutor-deal prosecutorial-misconduct unreasonable-determination |
Petitioner was tried in Ohio in 1991 for an aggravated murder committed during a carjacking allegedly perpetrated by two men. The State's entire case … |
| 23-7666 |
Brandon Washington v. Steven T. Marshall, Attorney General of Alabama, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-06-07 |
Denied |
IFP |
evidentiary-hearing factual-determination factual-record federal-habeas federal-review habeas-corpus state-court state-court-proceedings unreasonable-determination |
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2), a state prisoner can obtain federal habeas relief only by showing that the state court's denial of his claim was "based … |
| 22-6362 |
Carlos Santana R. Garcia v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-12-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection federal-law habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel unreasonable-determination |
1. Did the Court of Criminal APPeals of Texas and the US. Direraet Court Northeen Distact of Texas San AnGelo Division, eRe bi decidrna the merits of … |
| 22-5856 |
Tracy J. McGill v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections |
Oklahoma |
2022-10-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-indian-law federal-law habeas-corpus jurisdiction state-court subject-matter-jurisdiction unreasonable-determination |
I, UketW OKlakomo, Court ef tf'un'aai Appeals t)e./uaj of ft ttesc-e-alaivt of An En ftelM U1c-K.a4a.1i Sm^n'-s Subject-Matter TvtrUA\^\on Lieu rn In … |
| 21-6536 |
In Re Michael Robert Everett |
|
2021-12-07 |
Denied |
IFP |
5th-amendment civil-rights clearly-established-law due-process evidence federal-habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief state-court-record suppression-hearing unreasonable-determination |
(1) Were Counsel was Ineffective when Failed to Present to the Court During Suppression Hearing than the Petitioner Teks Mamanba Nataeig Watngr when I… |
| 20-5155 |
Charles E. Coughlin v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2020-07-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2255 constitutional-right constitutional-rights district-court-discretion evidentiary-hearing expert-witness ineffective-assistance-of-counsel medical-expert-witnesses strategic-decision unreasonable-determination |
1. Whether the court of appeals erred in denying petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel holding "appellant has not made a substantial… |
| 19-6999 |
Charles Alan Dyer v. Jim Farris, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-12-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process exhaustion-doctrine exhaustion-of-state-remedies federal-review habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-review-2254-d-2-e-1 ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel presumption-of-correctness prosecutorial-misconduct standard-of-review state-court-fact-finding state-court-factual-findings state-court-findings unreasonable-determination |
(1) In order to obtain relief under § 2254(d)(2), is a federal court required to review the state court's finding of facts to determine if it is "unre… |
| 18-7703 |
Nathan Smith III v. Sherry Pennywell, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-02-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
2254(d)(2) cumulative-error de-novo-review deference due-process fact-finding fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-review ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment standard-of-review unreasonable-determination |
1)
DID THE CCA SO STRETCH THE FACTS IN THIS CASE SO
UNREASONABLY THAT NO DEFERENCE COULD BE POSSIBLE
TO ITS INTERPETATION OF WHAT OCCURRED IN THE TACO… |
| 18-6786 |
Curtis J. Hill v. Joe A. Lizarraga, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
cause-of-death confrontation-clause due-process evidence expert-reports expert-testimony habeas-corpus medical-evidence pro-se pro-se-filing unreasonable-determination unreasonable-factual-findings |
1. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2) did the California Court of Appeal unreasonably determine the facts critical to a proper Confrontation Clause analysis… |