I, UketW OKlakomo, Court ef tf'un'aai Appeals t)e./uaj of ft ttesc-e-alaivt of An En ftelM U1c-K.a4a.1i Sm^n'-s Subject-Matter TvtrUA\^\on Lieu rn In State- Habeas ■fra md\ n|S ftejiuliei Xr\ A DecVian TKat viotS An UUueodOAable. fietefrmnation Of Tke. Facts In U^kt OftKe Evl W&. Xa Tb& State, touft Proceedings »

4. Vl kit Ur OKla-Ko^na-S, ft-s-s anted Tu-f )4di t-tiaa over fatitjciAer t /} T^e^tewicmt of FreedmeA of Tke, LkicKa-SauS titxVi QA Is tonifary To tlcar^. EstubtUhed F«-dUfal Lau)j Men Afc. Xs /fcaued. Of A Ma.'jr Cfinno Xn Xnikii Omn&$*

Whether Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' denial of petitioner's jurisdictional claim resulted in an unreasonable determination of the facts