rule-706
3 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22-5444 | Robert JW McCleland v. Rick Raemisch, et al. | Tenth Circuit | 2022-08-24 | Denied | IFP | expert-witness indigent-litigants judicial-notice medical-evidence medical-information pro-se pro-se-litigant rule-201 rule-706 undue-burden | 1. Does requiring an expert witness to present medical information, pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. Rule 201 Judicial Notice, create an undue burden on the co… |
| 21-277 | Betty E. Smith, as Attorney-In-Fact for Paul C. Smith, Individually and on Behalf of the ERISA-Covered Plan v. HPR Clinic, LLC, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2021-08-25 | Denied | daubert-standard district-court evidentiary-procedure expert-testimony federal-rules-of-evidence judicial-appointment methodology methodology-standards rule-706 | Whether an expert appointed by agreement of the parties by a District Court under Federal Rule of Evidence 706 must employ methodology that is general… | |
| 19-5205 | Zachary A. Smith v. John A. Matthews, et al. | Eighth Circuit | 2019-07-18 | Dismissed | IFP | circuit-split civil-rights due-process evidence evidentiary-motion medical-evidence prisoner-rights pro-se rule-706 summary-judgment | I SHOULD A PRO SE PRISONER BE PERMITTED TO ADMIT MEDICAL INFORMATION FROM A REPUTABLE WEBSITE AS "VERIFYING MEDICAL EVIDENCE" TO OVERCOME A MOTION FOR… |