No. 21-277
Betty E. Smith, as Attorney-In-Fact for Paul C. Smith, Individually and on Behalf of the ERISA-Covered Plan v. HPR Clinic, LLC, et al.
Tags: daubert-standard district-court evidentiary-procedure expert-testimony federal-rules-of-evidence judicial-appointment methodology methodology-standards rule-706
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether an expert appointed by agreement of the parties by a District Court under Federal Rule of Evidence 706 must employ methodology that is generally accepted within the relevant industry and comply with the Daubert qualitative standards?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an expert appointed by agreement of the parties by a District Court under Federal Rule of Evidence 706 must employ methodology that is generally accepted within the relevant industry and comply with the Daubert qualitative standards?
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2021)
Attorneys
Betty Smith, et al.
Leo Patrick Ross — Petitioner