rule-23(b)(3)
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-86 | Career Counseling, Inc., dba Snelling Staffing Services v. Amerifactors Financial Group, LLC | Fourth Circuit | 2024-07-26 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) | administrative-feasibility circuit-split class-certification fax-machine fax-machine-definition rule-23 rule-23(b)(3) telephone-consumer-protection-act | 1. Whether there is an implied "administrative fea- sibility" prerequisite for class certification, as held by the First, Third, and Fourth Circuits, … |
| 21-948 | Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates v. Monique Russell, et al. | Third Circuit | 2021-12-29 | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | certification civil-procedure class-action common-issues individual-issues predominance rule-23 rule-23(b)(3) rule-23(c)(4) | Whether, when an action involves both common and individual questions, a court may certify common questions for class treatment under Rule 23(b)(3) wi… |
| 20-7381 | Larry Wilkerson v. United States | District of Columbia | 2021-03-09 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | circuit-conflict evidence-based-concerns juror-discharge legal-disagreement rule-23(b)(3) sixth-amendment standard-of-review trial-court-discretion voir-dire | I. WHETHER THE COURT SHOULD RESOLVE THE CONFLI CT I N THE CI RCUI TS REGARDI NG THE STANDARD APPLI CABLE TO DETERMI NING W HEN THE SI XTH AMENDMENT PR… |
| 18-472 | Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC, et al. v. Terry Martin, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2018-10-12 | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | appellate-conflict civil-procedure class-certification courts-of-appeals federal-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure issue-certification issue-classes predominance predominance-requirement rule-23 rule-23(b)(3) rule-23(c)(4) | Whether plaintiffs, having failed to demonstrate that common issues predominate over individual issues as to their cause of action under Federal Rule … |