retrospective-application
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21-5268 | Ambus Ray Davis, III v. Nick Ludwick, Warden | Eighth Circuit | 2021-07-30 | Denied | IFP | constitutional-rule criminal-procedure direct-review due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment retrospective-application united-states-constitution | 1. WHETHER ALL NEWLY DECLARED CONSTITUTIONAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO JUDGMENTS OF CONVICTIONS NOT YET FINAL AND PENDING … |
| 18-1545 | Tracy Guerin v. Mickey Fowler, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2019-06-14 | Denied | Amici (2)Relisted (2) | constitutional-law due-process eleventh-amendment pension-transfer property-rights public-pensions retrospective-application state-authority state-immunity statutory-benefits takings takings-clause | 1. If a State's statutorily created pension system allows government employees to transfer their accumulated pension contributions into a different pe… |
| 18-6956 | Jason Dirk Walton v. Florida, et al. | Florida | 2018-12-07 | Denied | IFP | capital-murder criminal-law due-process eighth-amendment first-degree-murder jury-unanimity resentencing retrospective-application retrospective-law sentencing-elements substantive-criminal-law | 1. When changes in a state's substantive criminal set out the elements of capital murder which the prosecution must prove to the satisfaction of a una… |
| 18-6115 | Jose Antonio Jimenez v. Florida | Florida | 2018-09-27 | Denied | IFP | capital-murder criminal-sentencing death-penalty due-process elements-of-offense hurst-v-state jury-unanimity retrospective-application | 1. Given that the elements of capital murder set out by the Florida Supreme Court in Hurst v. State will govern as to whether James Card is guilty of … |