No. 21-5268
Ambus Ray Davis, III v. Nick Ludwick, Warden
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rule criminal-procedure direct-review due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment retrospective-application united-states-constitution
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. WHETHER ALL NEWLY DECLARED CONSTITUTIONAL RULE OF
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO
JUDGMENTS OF CONVICTIONS NOT YET FINAL AND PENDING
DIRECT REVIEW WHEN THE RULE WAS ESTABLISHED.
2. WHETHER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED
STATES CONSTITUTION PROVIDING STATE NOT DEPRIVE ANY
PERSON OF LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY, WITHOUT DUE
PROCESS OF LAW WAS DENIED; NOR DENY TO ANY PERSON
WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE
LAWS.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether newly declared constitutional rule of criminal procedure apply retrospectively
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)
Attorneys
Ambus Ray Davis
Ambus Ray Davis III — Petitioner