| 23A957 |
Benjamin Galecki and Burton Ritchie v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-04-25 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-violation criminal-conviction federal-appeal ninth-circuit panel-decision writ-of-certiorari |
Whether the Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act, 21 U.S.C. § 813, is void for vagueness as applied to synthetic cannabinoid XLR-11; and
Whe… |
| 22-7312 |
Jackie Mitchell v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-04-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-panel criminal-history domestic-violence federal-circuit-court federal-court-interpretation federal-implications panel-decision sixth-circuit-rule state-court-interpretation state-law state-law-interpretation |
To resolve a federal defendant's criminal history, must a circuit court panel use the current state court interpretations of state conviction, or may … |
| 21-7083 |
Michael Kenneth Rich v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-02-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
conspiracy criminal-sentencing due-process due-process-of-law future-tense-instruction individualized-responsibility individualized-sentencing panel-decision rico-conspiracy rico-enterprise |
1. Ifa RICO enterprise exists for legitimate associational as well as illegitimate purposes, does it violate due process and the obligation to individ… |
| 21-293 |
Vincent Alphonso Powell v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-08-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights competency competency-hearing constitutional-rights due-process forcible-medication mental-health panel-decision precedent standing waiver-of-rights |
1. Did Powell make a substantial showing that he was entitled to a competency hearing under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(c)(2)?
2. Did Powell make a substantial … |
| 19-8570 |
Yamil M. Vega v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-05-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-924 28-usc-2244 crime-of-violence due-process eleventh-circuit hobbs-act-robbery legal-precedent panel-decision procedural-constraints statutory-mandate |
1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit exceeds its statutory mandate under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(C) to determine only whether an inmate has made a "prima fa… |
| 19-956 |
Donald E. Craig, et al. v. Janet Turner O'Kelley, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Harley Turner, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-01-30 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
civil-procedure civil-rights clearly-established-law due-process government-officers harlow-standard harlow-v-fitzgerald moore-v-pederson panel-decision qualified-immunity timing-circumstance |
1. Whether a panel decision decided nine days before the relevant conduct in question constitutes clearly established law to deprive government office… |
| 18-7575 |
Alexis Valdes Gonzalez v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-01-25 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (9)IFP |
criminal-case criminal-procedure due-process eleventh-circuit judicial-process mandatory-form panel-decision preclusive-effect prior-panel-precedent strict-deadline writ-of-certiorari |
Whether the Due Process Clause permits the Eleventh Circuit to afford
preclusive effect in a criminal case to a prior panel decision that was: based o… |