| 24-6263 |
William S. Hurt, III v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2025-01-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process exculpatory-evidence fourteenth-amendment oklahoma-court-of-criminal-appeals post-conviction-dna statutory-rights |
I. Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (OCCA) violated Petitioner's statutory rights under the Oklahoma Post-Conviction DNA pursuant to Okl… |
| 23-5233 |
Randall Lamont Sanders v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2023-07-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment criminal-procedure due-process insufficiency-of-evidence jackson-v-virginia oklahoma-court-of-criminal-appeals standard-of-review supremacy-clause supreme-court-standard |
(1) Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals failed to apply this Court's standard for insufficiency of evidence as described in Jackson v. Virg… |
| 22-7765 |
Michael Tanner Lank v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2023-06-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process federal-constitution oklahoma-court-of-criminal-appeals petition-for-writ-of-certiorari state-constitution state-law-interpretation trial-by-jury |
1) Mr. Lank respectfully asks- '
Is the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Court, Rule 5.5 in conformity with
the DUE PROCESS OF LAW standards of the … |
| 22-7521 |
John Earnest Skrdla v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2023-05-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel oklahoma-court-of-criminal-appeals state-court-appeals strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
1. Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ruled in contrary to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687(1984) when it determined Petitioner… |
| 21-7217 |
Thomas Allen Twobabies v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2022-02-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction major-crimes-act mcgirt-decision montgomery-v-louisiana native-american-law oklahoma-court-of-criminal-appeals retroactivity schriro-v-summerlin supreme-court-precedent tribal-jurisdiction |
1. WHETHER THIS COURT'S DECISION IN MCGIRT V. OKLAHOMA APPLIES TO THE CHEYENNE AND ARAPAHO TRIBES FOR MAJOR CRIMES ACT PURPOSES.
2. WHETHER THE OKLAH… |