Michael Tanner Lank v. Oklahoma
1) Mr. Lank respectfully asks- '
Is the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Court, Rule 5.5 in conformity with
the DUE PROCESS OF LAW standards of the United States Constitution?
2) Mr. Lank Respectfully asks-
Did the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals violate the Oklahoma State
Constitution, Article II, § 6 and/or the United States Constitution, Amendment XIV
1 and/or United States Constitution, Amendment IX2, and/or United States
Constitution, Amendment 13 when it created, enacted and enforced O.C.C.A. Rule
5.5.
3) Mr. Lank Respectfully asks-
When the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals enforced O.C.C.A. Rule 5.5
Mr. Lank 's CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATED. [42 U.S.C.A. § 1983]? was
4) Mr. Lank Respectfully asks-
Did the State of Oklahoma violate Article III of the United States Constitution
by depriving Mr. Lank of a Constitutionally mandated Trial by Jury? 4
Is the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Court, Rule 5.5 in conformity with the DUE PROCESS OF LAW standards of the United States Constitution?