No. 22-7765

Michael Tanner Lank v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2023-06-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process federal-constitution oklahoma-court-of-criminal-appeals petition-for-writ-of-certiorari state-constitution state-law-interpretation trial-by-jury
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Mr. Lank respectfully asks- '
Is the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Court, Rule 5.5 in conformity with
the DUE PROCESS OF LAW standards of the United States Constitution?

2) Mr. Lank Respectfully asks-
Did the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals violate the Oklahoma State
Constitution, Article II, § 6 and/or the United States Constitution, Amendment XIV
1 and/or United States Constitution, Amendment IX2, and/or United States
Constitution, Amendment 13 when it created, enacted and enforced O.C.C.A. Rule
5.5.

3) Mr. Lank Respectfully asks-
When the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals enforced O.C.C.A. Rule 5.5
Mr. Lank 's CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATED. [42 U.S.C.A. § 1983]? was

4) Mr. Lank Respectfully asks-
Did the State of Oklahoma violate Article III of the United States Constitution
by depriving Mr. Lank of a Constitutionally mandated Trial by Jury? 4

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Court, Rule 5.5 in conformity with the DUE PROCESS OF LAW standards of the United States Constitution?

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-05-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 12, 2023)

Attorneys

Michael Lank
Michael Tanner Lank — Petitioner