joint-venture
10 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-5330 | Raymond Dugan v. United States | Fourth Circuit | 2025-08-12 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | constitutional-protections fourth-circuit joint-venture law-enforcement probable-cause search-warrant | 1. Did the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals construe the "Joint-Venture " doctrine too narrowly to comply with constitutional protections? 2. Should t… |
| 24-938 | American Airlines Group Inc. v. United States, et al. | First Circuit | 2025-03-03 | Denied | Amici (2) | anticompetitive-effects antitrust-law joint-venture market-competition procompetitive-effects rule-of-reason | Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits "unreasonable restraint[s] on competition." Leegin Creative Leather Prods, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877, 88… |
| 23-6210 | Andrew Pierson v. United States | Eighth Circuit | 2023-12-08 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | circuit-split exclusionary-rule foreign-searches fourth-amendment joint-venture judicial-conscience national-importance shocks-the-judicial-conscience | 1. Whether exceptions exist for the general proposition that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule does not apply to foreign searches and seizure. An… |
| 20-779 | Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation | Federal Circuit | 2020-12-08 | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | administrative-proceeding article-iii-standing article-three-standing fda-approval inter-partes-review joint-venture leahy-smith-america-invents-act patent-challenge patent-validity pharmaceutical-industry pharmaceutical-patent | Did the Federal Circuit categorically and erroneously preclude redress for injured members of joint ventures in the pharmaceutical industry by only re… |
| 20-6122 | Jerome Capelton v. United States | First Circuit | 2020-10-23 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | aiding-abetting aiding-and-abetting categorical-approach circuit-split criminal-law criminal-liability first-circuit joint-venture mens-rea realistic-probability sentencing | 1. Whether the First Circuit's application of the "realistic probability" standard in Mr. Capelton's case, where the elements of Massachusetts "joint … |
| 20-520 | American Athletic Conference, et al. v. Shawne Alston, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2020-10-20 | Judgment Issued | Amici (1) | antitrust joint-venture ncaa rule-of-reason sherman-act student-athlete student-athletes | Whether the Sherman Act authorizes a court to subject the product-defining rules of a joint venture to full Rule of Reason review, and to hold those r… |
| 19-8834 | Monosij Dutta-Roy v. Jysk Bed'n Linen, dba By Design Furniture, as Successor to Quick Ship Holding, Inc., dba By Design Furniture | Eleventh Circuit | 2020-06-26 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | cybersquatting-protection domain domain-name-dispute equitable-accounting fiduciary-duty joint-venture joint-venture-rights profit-sharing retroactive-application trademark-ownership | The issues, in this sum of matters, between pro se Monosij Dutta-Roy (Petitioner or Dutta-Roy) and Jysk Bed 'N Linen, formerly Quick Ship Holding, DBA… |
| 19-1098 | National Football League, et al. v. Ninth Inning, Inc., et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2020-03-09 | Denied | Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (6) | antitrust-market competition-harm damages-claim illinois-brick indirect-purchaser joint-venture rule-of-reason sherman-act | 1. Whether an agreement among the members of a joint venture on how best to distribute the venture's jointly created core product may be condemned und… |
| 19-322 | The Medical Center at Elizabeth Place, LLC v. Atrium Health System, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2019-09-09 | Denied | Response Waived | antitrust antitrust-jurisprudence antitrust-law competitive-restraint competitive-restraints joint-venture joint-ventures per-se-rule per-se-violation procompetitive-rationale rule-of-reason sherman-act sherman-act-1 summary-judgment | When assessing the legality of competitive restraints imposed by joint ventures, this Court's antitrust jurisprudence recognizes that overly lax enfor… |
| 18-291 | Gul Jaisinghani v. Anil Sharma, et al. | California | 2018-09-07 | Denied | Response Waived | bank-fraud constitutional-rights due-process duplicative-damages fair-trial joint-venture substantive-due-process supremacy-clause witness-exclusion | 1. Given that a conspiracy to commit bank fraud is clearly illegal under federal law, as highlighted in the recent Manafort case, does a state's enfor… |