intervening-change-in-law
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19-8464 | Jamal Mitchell, aka Boo v. United States | Fourth Circuit | 2020-05-14 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | ancillary-proceeding civil-procedure direct-appeal due-process forfeiture-order intervening-change-in-law rule-41g rule-60b standing | I. Does an order has to be first challenged on direct appeal before the order can be later challenged in an ancillary- proceeding based on an interv… |
| 18-8239 | Negus Thomas v. United States | Second Circuit | 2019-03-04 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appellate-review court-of-appeals criminal-procedure crosby-remand district-court intervening-change-in-law jacobson-remand law-of-the-case law-of-the-case-doctrine manifest-injustice new-evidence reasonableness reasonableness-review resentencing sentencing | On a Crosby remand, the district court decided not to resentence the defendants. On a Jacobson remand, the district court again decided not to resente… |
| 18-7082 | Juan Bautista Rosas Cuellar v. United States | Fifth Circuit | 2018-12-18 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-procedure collateral-estoppel criminal-defendant due-process intervening-change-in-law intervening-law-change issue-preclusion legal-doctrine offensive-preclusion summary-reversal | I. May collateral estoppel ever be applied offensively against a criminal defendant, to bar him from relitigating an issue resolved in a previous case… |
| 18-6394 | Jimmy Steele v. United States | Fifth Circuit | 2018-10-22 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | career-offender constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection extraordinary-circumstances gatekeeping-provision habeas-corpus intervening-change-in-law retroactivity second-motion successive-petitions | In denying Steele's Second-in-time §2255 motion, did the lower court(s) err in there finding that the district court lacks jurisdiction to hear Steele… |
| 18-6061 | Rogelio Ortiz-Martinez v. United States | Fifth Circuit | 2018-09-20 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | change-in-law criminal-appeal divisible-statute fifth-circuit intervening-change-in-law judicial-proceedings mandate mandate-rule recall-of-mandate rehearing-petition sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines texas-burglary-statute | I. In a direct criminal appeal, is it a serious departure from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings when a federal court of appeals r… |