I. Does an order has to be first challenged on direct appeal
before the order can be later challenged in an ancillary-
proceeding based on an intervening change in law?

II. Can Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure be
invoked to challenge aspects of a forfeiture order?

III. Did the Court's decision in Honeycutt pose a jurisdictional
contraint on the government's authority and a court's
competence to seek and order forfeiture of property that has
no connection to a crime?

Does an order have to be first challenged on direct appeal before the order can be later challenged in an ancillary proceeding based on an intervening change in law?