| 25-5452 |
In Re Andrew James Johnston |
|
2025-08-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence constitutional-privilege filing-restrictions habeas-corpus merits-determination section-2255 |
1. Is petitioner entitled to immediate relief, including issuance of a writ of habeas corpus from this Court, to protect the privilege of habeas corpu… |
| 23A662 |
Jacques Saade v. Fay Servicing, LLC, et al. |
First Circuit |
2024-01-18 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-procedure filing-restrictions judicial-economy mortgage-default pro-se-litigation sanctions |
Question not identified. |
| 23A5 |
Darryl Smith v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-07-03 |
Presumed Complete |
|
access-to-courts criminal-conviction filing-restrictions habeas-corpus mandamus prisoner-rights |
Question not identified. |
| 21-6938 |
David Charles Sussman v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Florida |
2022-01-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights due-process filing-restrictions pro-se suspension-clause |
1. Does the Fla. court's imposition of an all-inclusive, total pro
3. Where a Fla court has never deemed any ofa litigant' leadings he filed therein … |
| 19-8480 |
Stanley J. Caterbone v. National Security Agency |
Third Circuit |
2020-05-19 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
abuse-of-authority civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process filing-restrictions government-abuse government-misconduct judicial-misconduct national-security pro-se-petition standing |
Is there Judicial Misconduct and Abuse of Authority and are the courts attempting to hide the fact that there are abuses by the military and intellige… |
| 18-5420 |
Tyler T. Heagy v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
2018-07-31 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeal-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process filing-restrictions habeas-corpus post-conviction-relief procedural-due-process right-to-appeal right-to-counsel standing statutory-interpretation unconstitutional-as-applied |
Was 42 Pa.C.S.A. §9543 (a)(1)(i) unconstitutional as applied to Petitioners case?
Were 42 Pa.C.S.A. §9545 (b) and (c) unconstitutional as applied to … |