No. 21-6938

David Charles Sussman v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2022-01-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights due-process filing-restrictions pro-se suspension-clause
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does the Fla. court's imposition of an all-inclusive, total pro

3. Where a Fla court has never deemed any ofa litigant' leadings he filed therein to have been frivolous, malicious or repetitive, would that court's imposition of an all-inclusive, total pro se filing bar on that litigant be impermissibly overbroad in violation of U. S. Const. 1s 14 Amendments?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Fla. court's imposition of an all-inclusive, total pro se filing bar violate the Suspension Clause of U.S. Const., Art. I, sec. 9?

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-23
Waiver of right of respondent Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, FL Dept. of Corr. to respond filed.
2021-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 23, 2022)

Attorneys

David Sussman
David Charles Sussman — Petitioner
Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, FL Dept. of Corr.
Kristen J. LonerganOffice of the Attorney General of Florida, Respondent