ex-parte-orders
3 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-6055 | Debora D. v. John D., et al. | California | 2023-11-20 | Denied | IFP | custody due-process ex-parte ex-parte-orders idea-law jurisdiction parental-rights special-education state-encroachment | Did the court make a mistake rendering orders on an ex-parte basis? Did the ex-parte application render the necessary elements for ex-parte relief? … |
| 22-6285 | In Re Jason D. Fisher | 2022-12-12 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process ex-parte-order ex-parte-orders in-forma-pauperis motion-practice standing temporary-protection-order | 1. Is "permission based motion practice " legal or "negative gatekeeping " legal whereby a citizen must ask for permission to file a motion as practic… | |
| 18-1045 | Nathaniel Brent, et al. v. Wayne County Department of Human Services, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2019-02-08 | Denied | Response Waived | 42-usc-1983 4th-amendment administrative-policy civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process ex-parte-orders judicial-oversight qualified-immunity rooker-feldman-doctrine standing | 1. This Court has made clear that the RookerFeldman Doctrine is simply an application of 28 U.S.C. § 1257. Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine bar a 42 U… |