1. Is "permission based motion practice " legal or "negative gatekeeping " legal whereby a
citizen must ask for permission to file a motion as practiced in NEW YORK State
Supreme Court, Westchester County?

2. If a citizen is denied the abilty to gain a hearing within a reasonable time or if
judgments are decided prior to a hearing that adversely affect the citizen due to the
order, are ex parte Temporary Protection Orders unconstitutional, what risks occur to the
Public and how can they be fixed?

3. Should an unincarcerated person 's in forma pauperis (IFP) status or a person 's
financial status cause them to be subject to a loss of constitutional rights especially when
the IFP status is due to crimes that are the subject of the complaint?

4. Are Plaintiffs Constitutional rights being violated and do these violations warrant the
Complaint to be heard by a jury outside of the 2nd Circuit?

Is 'permission based motion practice' legal or 'negative gatekeeping' legal?