| 24-175 |
Kathleen M. Bonczyk v. John Wardle, et al. |
Florida |
2024-08-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
communication-restrictions due-process ex-parte-communications judicial-policy procedural-safeguards state-court |
1. Whether violations of the Due Process Clause occur when a state judicial policy authorizes exceptions to the proscription against ex parte communic… |
| 23-989 |
Robert J. Murphy v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Third Circuit |
2024-03-11 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights constitutional-rights disciplinary-proceedings due-process ex-parte-communications first-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-code sixth-amendment workers-compensation |
1. Where petitioner sought removal in 2010 of unelected administrative Workers' Compensation judges involving their actual or apparent improprieties i… |
| 21-8192 |
Ronnie L. Thums v. Larry Fuchs, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-06-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
due-process ex-parte-communications ex-parte-meeting habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-bias jury-tampering right-to-counsel |
1. Whether a judge, sitting on the bench; admitting; not having jurisdiction over an issue, but makes a criminal threat to sue defendant of liable; wh… |
| 21-7162 |
Jose Jaime Lopez v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-02-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights conflict-of-interest criminal-intent due-process ex-parte-communications false-statement federal-agent judicial-bias knowingly-false materiality obstruction-of-justice public-confidence |
Whether it is Consistent with this Courts holding in CAPERTON v. A. MASSEY COAL CO., 556 U.S. 868, 129 S.Ct 2541 (2009) and the Imperatives of Due Pro… |
| 20-1535 |
Kevin Diaz v. Ashley Johnson |
First Circuit |
2021-05-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-action administrative-procedure-act agency-action apa arbitrary-and-capricious chevron-deference ex-parte-communication ex-parte-communications judicial-review statutory-interpretation technology tucker-act |
1. Whether the Lower Court erred in not admitting nexus evidence for administrative action taken under the jurisdiction of §§ 702 706 of the APA imple… |
| 20-524 |
Yi Tai Shao v. John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice, Supreme Court of the United States, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2020-10-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
court-jurisdiction court-records default-judgment disqualification due-process ex-parte-communication ex-parte-communications judicial-bias judicial-recusal recusal |
1. Did the district court and court of appeal violate due process by failing to rule on requests for recusal and disqualification, and failure to prov… |
| 19-1431 |
David E. Olson, et al. v. Mark O'Brien, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-06-26 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment administrative-hearing administrative-law bias due-process ex-parte ex-parte-communication ex-parte-communications fourteenth-amendment notice-and-hearing state-agency |
Whether the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits biased, ex parte communications between state agency officials which reverse an adm… |
| 19-5468 |
Tara Glass v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2019-08-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process ex-parte-communication ex-parte-communications fair-trial judicial-complaint judicial-integrity judicial-misconduct liberty-interest liberty-interests right-to-marry supervised-release |
This case presents a fascinating issue of first impression at the intersection of constitutional due process and the confidential judicial complaint r… |
| 19-5223 |
Bobby Minnis v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-07-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3582 criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process ex-parte-communication ex-parte-communications federal-sentencing judicial-discretion sentencing-modification state-sentencing |
Whether a federal district judge can make the internally contradictory oral pronouncement that a federal sentence is to be served concurrent with one … |
| 18-1091 |
Afoluso Adesanya, et vir v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. |
Third Circuit |
2019-02-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-court-review civil-rights discovery discovery-violation due-process employment-discrimination ex-parte-communication ex-parte-communications judicial-conduct judicial-sanctions pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation sanctions |
Whether the 3rd Circuit Appeals Court erred in upholding the decision of Federal District Court to dismiss Petitioner One employment discrimination La… |