| 22-6223 |
Byron O. Woods Sr. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2022-12-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure clearly-erroneous-standard conclusions-of-law court-of-appeals fact-finding federal-circuit judicial-conflict legal-findings pullman-standard rule-52(a) standard-of-review |
(1) The Pullman-Standard , 456 U.S. 273 (1982), this Court developed which is the
standard for reviewing jurisprudence for issues of fact and issues … |
| 22-6040 |
William H. Wyttenbach v. Roy A. Cooper, III, Governor of North Carolina |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-11-10 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
article-iii-court civil-procedure conclusions-of-law constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process findings-of-fact fourth-circuit-court jurisdiction rule-of-law |
Question: Has the Fourth Circuit
Appellate Court and the lower court violated
all three foundational corner stones of Rule
of Law; Jurisdiction, Fin… |
| 21-6677 |
Shawn Pinson v. Texas |
Texas |
2021-12-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review conclusions-of-law constitutional-rights due-process findings-of-fact habeas-corpus judicial-review procedural-due-process texas-criminal-appeals trial-court-findings |
IS THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS VIOLATING PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS BY DENYING RELIEF TO HABEAS APPLICANTS WITHOUT EXPLANATION WHEN THE TRIAL COUR… |
| 18-8881 |
Garry Coleman v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-04-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split civil-procedure civil-procedure-rule-52-rule-60 coa competency conclusions-of-law due-process federal-procedure findings-of-fact habeas-corpus rule-60b-motion |
CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE DISTRICT COURT FAILED TO PROVIDE ANY FINDINGS OF FACT SPECIALLY AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AS IS REQUIRED BY… |
| 18-6693 |
Victor M. Mangual-Rosado v. United States |
First Circuit |
2018-11-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review circuit-split conclusions-of-law criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court findings-of-fact opportunity-to-object procedural-error role-behavior role-in-crime sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantive-error |
I. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED PROCEDURALLY AND SUBSTANTIVELY BY IMPOSING AN EXCESSIVE SENTENCE IN TERMS OF THE DEFENDANT-APPELLANT'S ROLE BEHAVI… |