No. 18-6693
Victor M. Mangual-Rosado v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split conclusions-of-law criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court findings-of-fact opportunity-to-object procedural-error role-behavior role-in-crime sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantive-error
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED PROCEDURALLY AND SUBSTANTIVELY BY IMPOSING AN EXCESSIVE SENTENCE IN TERMS OF THE DEFENDANT-APPELLANT'S ROLE BEHAVIOR IN THE COMMISSION OF THE CRIME CHARGED.
II. THE EXISTENCE OF A CIRCUIT SPLIT REGARDING THE REQUIREMENT BY A DISTRICT COURT, AFTER IMPOSING A SENTENCE, TO GIVE THE PARTIES AN OPPORTUNITY TO OBJECT TO THE COURT'S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-district-court-erred-in-sentencing
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Victor M. Mangual-Rosado
Luis A. Guzman-Dupont — Lcdo. Luis A Guzman Dupont, Petitioner